Will SEAL Team Six Strike Chapo Guzman in Mexico?

The conflict in the Middle East is winding down, US forces are withdrawing, and wars are being handed over to various proxy forces to fight in the context of the so-called Arab Spring from Egypt, to Libya, to Syria.  Once Syria falls, more than likely after the US Presidential elections are complete, the Arab Spring with US covert assistance will almost certainly shift its focus to the gem of Eurasia, Iran.  But that is another story.

Meanwhile, the policy makers and official white papers are talking about a strategic pivot, a realignment of US forces to confront a real or perceived growing of Chinese spheres of influence in the Pacific Rim.  This has already begun in earnest with China feuding with the Philippines and several South East Asian nations regarding territory disputes, mostly related to islands in the South China Sea.  Another realignment of US military and intelligence assets is to the Southern Cone, Central and South America.

The third realignment is to turn the surveillance and intelligence gathering techniques and tactics developed for the War on Terror inward for domestic use, mostly under the banner of cyber-security.  The defense establishment will not simply let contracts expire and shrink their margins, rather they will seek out new venues to apply the same methods of operation.

The second realignment involves various Unmanned Aerial Vehicles being reoriented into the Southern Hemisphere, but there are also a number of rumors that just don’t want to die.  Has the Asymmetrical Warfare Group been south of the border to study cartel tactics, techniques, and procedures?  Are Spanish-speaking SEAL Team Six operators working with FES, Mexico’s Maritime Commando equivalent?   Many attribute the Mexican Marines, and other military forces recent successes in capturing high value targets to close cooperation and assistance from American military and intelligence sources, much of which was hashed out as a part of the Mérida Initiative.

All of this happens in the background of the so-called Fast and Furious scandal in which the ATF first ordered American gun shop owners to sell guns to straw buyers, and then intentionally allowed them to be smuggled across the border into the hands of cartel sicarios, or assassins.  The excuse given by ATF and the Justice Department was that the weapons were allowed to “walk” across the border so that law enforcement officials could track them to the recipients and use the information to make arrests.  This excuse is just that, a pathetic cover story for what actually happened.  Why was no effort made to Tag, Track, and Locate the smuggled weapons?

Read the rest at SOFREP!

 

Advertisements

11 Comments

Filed under News, Special Forces

11 responses to “Will SEAL Team Six Strike Chapo Guzman in Mexico?

  1. Mr. Murphy, I’d love to hear your take on this and many of the things mentioned in that article.

  2. Mr. Murphy,

    First off, I bought your book, “Reflexive Fire.” You’re off to a great start on it and I’m really enjoying it. (I nearly hesitate mentioning this because I’m the pickiest reader in the world and don’t finish about half of what I start, but I did want you to know I sent some dough your way whether I finish it or not.)

    Second, you make some great points above, but I’m really interested in your opinion on the direction the country is going in regards to National Security. Specifically, I’m referring to the shifting of forces to challenge China. What’s your take on that?

    I’ve been writing for a while that I think it’s a bad idea, and I’ve yet to have anyone make a cogent case for why we should. Would love to hear your thoughts.

    Yours,
    Stan

    • I have my own doubts as well. Where to begin…

      Look at how China got favored nation status in the 1990’s and the technology transfers that were initiated at that time. We did the same thing with the Soviets. It has been said that there was no such thing as Soviet technology, it all came from the West.

      Why did we do this? I would make the case that it was about the maintenance of strategic tension in certain parts of the world. That’s controversial though.

      On the other hand, China really is up to no good in SE Asia and elsewhere. The fact is though, that in much of the world they are simply offering a better deal than the IMF and World Bank are. China uses the carrot while America is running around using the stick. I think we will lose in the long run.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s